<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Labelling Nano Particles</title>
	<link>http://blog.nanovic.com.au/2006/10/26/labelling-nano-particles/</link>
	<description>Australian perspectives on nanotechnologies</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 11:16:39 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Blog @ NanoVic - Encouraging Public Debate</title>
		<link>http://blog.nanovic.com.au/2006/10/26/labelling-nano-particles/#comment-110</link>
		<dc:creator>Blog @ NanoVic - Encouraging Public Debate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 10:05:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.nanovic.com.au/2006/10/26/labelling-nano-particles/#comment-110</guid>
		<description>[...] Steve Mullins from the ACTU talked about his engagement with Standards Australia and the work they are doing around toxicity and safety standards, so it was good to hear a different view on hazards and labelling.  Georgia Miller from Friends of the Earth stressed the importance of public involvement in decision-making and a need for government committment to the responsible development of nanotechnologies. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Steve Mullins from the ACTU talked about his engagement with Standards Australia and the work they are doing around toxicity and safety standards, so it was good to hear a different view on hazards and labelling.  Georgia Miller from Friends of the Earth stressed the importance of public involvement in decision-making and a need for government committment to the responsible development of nanotechnologies. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
